Breaking News


Supreme Court Stayed Trial Court proceedings against Nithyananda in the 2010 rape case

Nithyananda Supreme Court rape case trial next date: 5 Dec. 2017

Nithyananda is a NORMAL ADULT and CAPABLE (Not impotent) - says Supreme Court Ordered Medical Tests; report exposes Nithy's fake claims of being 6-years old!

Updates from Courts


Trial court hears arguments on charge & discharge arguments for all accused. Next hearing in Trial Court on 21-08-17

Supreme Court directs Trial Court to continue with trial proceedings (arguments on charge) in Interim Order dated 7-11-2016.

Supreme Court DISMISSED ALL PETITIONS by Nithyananda and his Secretaries to Quash Charge Sheet (3rd Sep 2014)

High Court DISMISSED ALL PETITIONS by Nithyananda and his Secretaries to Quash Charge Sheet (16th Jul 2014)


17 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against whistleblower Dharmananda (lenin) by Nithyananda Cult Members!!!!

14 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against victim Aarthi Rao by Nithyananda & his Cult Members!!!! (All of them after charge sheet against Nithyananda)

3 cases filed in the US against Accused 1 Nithyananda (Mr. Rajasekar), Nithyananda Foundation, Life Bliss Foundation,

4 cases filed in India against Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam for fraud:

Donors of Hyderabad Ashram, Rajapalayam Ashram,Trichy ashram and Seeragapadi Ashram (near Salem) demand that fraudulently obtained donations be returned


Renowned Forensic Expert Padma Bhushan Prof. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan states "video not morphed"

Nithyananda dismissed from Madurai Adheenam (on 19th Oct 2012), Nithyananda is banned from entering Madurai Adheenam mutt

Friday, October 19, 2012

Tamil Nadu govt seeks removal of Madurai Adheenam

Tamil Nadu today moved a court here seeking removal of the head of a 1,500-year-old Saivaite mutt accusing him of failure to perform his duty and forming a trust along with controversial self-styled godman Nithyananda with the ulterior motive of selling properties of the mutt. 

The petition filed by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Commissioner Dhanabal before the Principal Sub-Court seeking removal of Madurai Adheenam Sri Arunagirinathar also submitted that the appointment of Nithyananda as the next pontiff was made without following the mutt's established procedures, custom and tradition.
The petitioner said the adheenam was not doing the 'Saya Rakshai Arakattalai Pooja' (evening pooja) at the famous Sri Meenakshi Amman temple for the past ten years and attached a certificate from temple authorities to this effect.

regarding the appointment of Nithyanandha as the 293rd pontiff of the Mutt in April last, which had triggered protests from various quarters including several other Hindu mutt heads, he said only a mutt disciple could succeed as the heir of the Mutt.
But Nithyanandha was not a disciple of the Mutt. This was also violation of the provisions of the HR and CE Act. Series of objections and complaints had been raised against Nithyanandha's appointment, he submitted.
The Commissioner charged that the present adheenam had also formed a trust, jointly with Nithyanandha, on April 23, and registered it under the name Madurai Adheenam Trust. The motive of the trust, which has the two as trustees, was to sell the properties of the Mutt, he said contending the execution of the trust deed violated rules.
Judge Guruviah said he would hear the mutt and posted the case for hearing tomorrow.

No comments:

Post a Comment