Breaking News

BREAKING NEWS


Nithyananda rape case trial next date: 6 Sept. 2018


Updates from Courts

UPDATES FROM COURTS


Supreme Court DISMISSED ALL PETITIONS by Nithyananda and his Secretaries to Discharge them without a trial (June 2018)



NITHYANANDA FOUNDATION GUILTY OF FRAUD - US COURT ORDERED RETURN OF DONATIONS 2012

17 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against whistleblower Dharmananda (lenin) by Nithyananda Cult Members!!!!

14 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against victim Aarthi Rao by Nithyananda & his Cult Members!!!! (All of them after charge sheet against Nithyananda)

3 cases filed in the US against Accused 1 Nithyananda (Mr. Rajasekar), Nithyananda Foundation, Life Bliss Foundation,

4 cases filed in India against Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam for fraud:

Donors of Hyderabad Ashram, Rajapalayam Ashram,Trichy ashram and Seeragapadi Ashram (near Salem) demand that fraudulently obtained donations be returned

NITHYANANDA SLEAZE CD GENUINE : CID & FSL REPORT

Renowned Forensic Expert Padma Bhushan Prof. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan states "video not morphed"


Nithyananda dismissed from Madurai Adheenam (on 19th Oct 2012), Nithyananda is banned from entering Madurai Adheenam mutt


Tuesday, September 21, 2010

CID may cancel Bangalore Sex Swami's bail

CID may cancel Bangalore Sex Swami's bail



Bangalore:  Taking a serious note of the development in the Swami Nityananda case, the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) is chalking out legal strategies to get his bail cancelled.

According to officials, there are chances that Nityananda might influence or pressurise the witness to turn hostile through various means.

Nithyananda's devotees had earlier filed a trespass case against Lenin, a prime witness in the case.

Lenin is the complainant in the Nityananda case who presented a video footage that allegedly showed Swami Nityananda with Tamil actress Ranjitha in a compromising state.

According to the CID, Nityananda's devotees filed a trespass case against Lenin first with the Ramanagar Superintendent of Police, which was later transferred to the CID.

The devotees then filed a case with the court and accused Lenin for the same. However, investigating officer Yogappa produced a statement in the court saying that Lenin had not trespassed in the Ashram.

The devotees then filed a case of contempt against Yogappa.

A CID officer feels that if such incidents are repeated, it may have serious repercussions on the witnesses who may go hostile.

"This is a systematic plan to put pressure on the investigators and setting a bad example," said an officer.

He added the example of witnesses such as Ranjitha and Vinay Bhardwaj who have already turned hostile in this case, though they were said to have prepared themselves to give their statements earlier.

Ranjitha, who was questioned by a team of CID officials, had recently denied that she was not in the video, and her face may have been morphed.

Her statement came despite the CID having a Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report from Hyderabad, stating that the video was genuine, and not tampered.

1 comment:

  1. I am so thankful tothis brave person to come up and stand for truth.
    May god give her the strength to go through the whole procedure.it must be terrible for her. if there is any way in which we can help her . Do let us know.

    ReplyDelete