Breaking News

BREAKING NEWS


Nithyananda rape case trial next date: 6 Sept. 2018


Updates from Courts

UPDATES FROM COURTS


Supreme Court DISMISSED ALL PETITIONS by Nithyananda and his Secretaries to Discharge them without a trial (June 2018)



NITHYANANDA FOUNDATION GUILTY OF FRAUD - US COURT ORDERED RETURN OF DONATIONS 2012

17 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against whistleblower Dharmananda (lenin) by Nithyananda Cult Members!!!!

14 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against victim Aarthi Rao by Nithyananda & his Cult Members!!!! (All of them after charge sheet against Nithyananda)

3 cases filed in the US against Accused 1 Nithyananda (Mr. Rajasekar), Nithyananda Foundation, Life Bliss Foundation,

4 cases filed in India against Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam for fraud:

Donors of Hyderabad Ashram, Rajapalayam Ashram,Trichy ashram and Seeragapadi Ashram (near Salem) demand that fraudulently obtained donations be returned

NITHYANANDA SLEAZE CD GENUINE : CID & FSL REPORT

Renowned Forensic Expert Padma Bhushan Prof. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan states "video not morphed"


Nithyananda dismissed from Madurai Adheenam (on 19th Oct 2012), Nithyananda is banned from entering Madurai Adheenam mutt


Friday, March 23, 2012

Nithyananda Video Authentic



Summary:
A forensic expert Mr. Chandra shekar shares his professionl opinion that the scandal videos are authentic. He was contact by Nithyananda ashram imediately after the scandal requesting him to declare the videos as morphed. Mr. Chandra shekar requested them to bring the original videos along with other sample videos to check for morphing, however they did not contact him again. Another media group contacted him and gave him the videos and samples as requested. Then he was able to verify that the videos were infact authentic and there was no morphing in it.

Regarding Nithyananda's claims that US forensic reports state the video to be morphed, Mr Chandra Shekar states that maybe the video that was sent to the US labs were morphed, but certainly the ones he tested had no morphing in it. Also, responding to Nithyanada's US forensic lab reports (publicized by Nithyananda in a press meet in Chennai) and statements in that report claiming the video was grossly defamatory, Mr. Chandra shekar observed that it is not the forensic experts job to claim the video was defamatory, only a court can do that. The forensic expert should only attest to the authenticity of the video.

No comments:

Post a Comment