Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth. Those were the golden words of Mahatma Gandhi! TRUTH is what this blog is about... truth about Nithyananda and his cult. Don't fall prey to his charming lies... before you learn more about his real intent from the ex-members of his cult.
SATYAMEVA JAYATE (Let truth alone triumph!)
Breaking News & Special Messages
BREAKING NEWS AND MESSAGES
FRESH COMPLAINT OF FRAUD AND RACKETEERING AGAINST NITHYANANDA AND HIS SECRETARIES IN USA
Nithyananda take over Mahalingeshwar Mutt of Karnataka: Stiff opposition and condemned by Veera Shaiva Lingayat Leaders
Police Deny Permission for Nithyananda to Celebrate His Birthday in Public Premises
NITHYANANDA DISMISSED FROM MADURAI ADHEENAM
NITHYANANDA FOUNDATION GUILTY OF FRAUD - US COURT ORDERED RETURN OF DONATIONS
ONE MORE VICTIM SPEAKS OUT against Nithyananda's crimes
2nd Charge Sheet filed against Nithyananda and Dhyanapeetam trustee Jamuna Rani
Renowned Forensic Expert Padma Bhushan Prof. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan states "video not morphed"
Nithyananda's followers forcefully occupied disputed property in Rajapalyam, Tamil Nadu - sources say
Dharmananda files a petition at Karnataka High Court, to quash the (false) complaint filed by Mrs. Ranjitha in the Ramanagar Court
3 More (false) criminal complaints filed against whistle-blower Dharmananda (Lenin) and other witnesses, in Chennai!!
Complaints were filed by Nithyananda Cult
members accused Sri Nithya Atma prabhananda and Mrs. Ranjitha
3 cases filed in the US against Accused 1 Nithyananda (Mr. Rajasekar), Nithyananda Foundation, Life Bliss Foundation,
Accused 2 Mr. Gopal Reddy Sheelum (Sri Nithya Bhaktananda), Accused 3 Mr. Siva Vallabhaneni (Sri Nithya Sachitananda), Accused 5 Mrs. Ragini Vallabhaneni (Ma Nithya Sachitananda)
and Ma Nithya Sadananda (Mrs. Jamuna Rani)
3 cases filed in India against Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam for fraud:
Donors of Hyderabad Ashram, Rajapalayam Ashram and Seeragapadi Ashram (near Salem) demand that
fraudulently obtained donations be returned
Nithyananda Cult member Ms. A. Pushpa alias Ma Nithya Supriyananda's (false) complaint against Dharmananda (Lenin) - closed (investigation report issued) after police investigations confirmed the complaint has very serious factual errors
High Court quashes summons issued to Dharmananda (Lenin) in the private complaint filed by Nithyananda Cult member Mrs. Anjula Jackson
UPDATE:C.I.D. closed (issued B report for) 4 complaints filed against Lenin (Dharmananda) for trespass, etc, after confirming the complaints were false
False complaints were filed by Nithyananda Cult members Ms. Lori Alice Espersen, Mrs. Rajeshwari Gunasekaran, Mr. Vijay Venkatraman, Mr. Surya Prakash
Updates from Courts
UPDATES FROM COURTS
Accused no. 4 Sri Nithya Sadhananda (Mr. Dhanasekar)and accused no. 5 Mrs. Ragini Vallabhaneni (Ma Nithya Sachitananda) also filed petitions to remove them from accused list!! - Adjourned @ High Court
Accused no. 2 Mr. Gopal Reddy Sheelum (Sri Nithya Bhaktananda) petitions to remove him from accused list!! - Adjourned @ High Court
Ms. A. Pushpa (Ma Nithya Supriyananda) filed a case against the Home Secretary of Karnataka, the Director General of Karnataka Police and Supdt. of Police - Adjourned @ High court
13 Complaints filed so far against whistleblower Dharmananda (lenin) by Nithyananda Cult Members!!!!
- Sri Nithya Atma prabhananda filed a complaint in Chennai against Dharmananda, 2 key witnesses and others! - Mrs. Ranjitha filed another complaint against Dharmananda, in Chennai
- Mrs. Anjula Jackson's (Ma Nithya Viroopananda) case against Dharmananda: High Court quashes summons issued to Dharmananda (Lenin) in this case - Mrs. Ranjitha's (false) case against Dharmananda: adjourned to Oct @ Ramanagar court
- Ma Nithya Sahajatmananda (Ms. Jayanthi) files a private complaint against Dharmananda (Lenin) and 4 other key witnesses: Adjourned @ Ramanagar court - 4 private complaints filed by Nithyananda followers against Dharmananda
HIGH COURT DISMISSED ACCUSED NO. 1 NITHYANANDA'S PETITION TO QUASH F.I.R & CHARGE SHEET
-Next hearing for main case (filed by CID against Nithyananda) - Adjourned @ Ramanagar court
இதே தலைப்பில் முன்னரே எழுயிருந்தோம். இன்னும் எத்தனை தடவை அப்படியே எழுதுவது?
தி.மு.கவின் தோல்வியை தங்களது வெற்றியாக கொண்டாடும் பட்டியலில் பொறுக்கி நித்தியானந்தாவும் சேர்ந்திருக்கிறார். இவரது சாபத்தால்தான் தி.மு.க படுதோல்வி அடைந்திருக்கிறதாம். இந்த உண்மையை தனது பொற்கால ஆட்சிக்காக ஏங்கித்தான் தமிழக மக்கள் வாக்களித்திருக்கிறார்கள் என்று பேசும் புரட்சித் தலைவியின் காதில் யாராவது போட்டு வைத்தால் அம்பிக்கு சட்னி நிச்சயம்.
திருவண்ணாமலையில் தரிசனம் கொடுத்த இந்த பொறுக்கி இன்னமும் தெனாவெட்டாக பேசியிருக்கிறார். ரஞ்சிதாவுடன் அவர் செய்த நடவடிக்கைகள் எல்லாம் மாஃபிங் செய்யப்பட்டதாம். வீடியோ படத்தில் இருப்பது அவரில்லையாம். அப்படியே இருந்தாலும் அதை கேட்க வேண்டியது நீதிமன்றம்தானாம். இப்படி ஃபுல் மப்பில் பேசக்கூடிய கருத்துக்களை இந்த சாமியார் நிதானமாகவே உதிர்த்திருக்கிறார்.
இத்தனை அம்பலப்பட்ட பிறகும் ஒரு மோசடிக்காரன் தனது காவி சாம்ராஜ்ஜியத்தை மீண்டும் எந்தப் பழுதுமில்லாமல் கட்ட முடிகிறது என்பதுதான் நாம் கவலைப்படத்தக்க ஒன்று. நித்தியானந்தாவின் பொறுக்கித்தனத்தை அடக்கப்பட்ட இளைஞனின் காமம் என்று அனுதாபப் பா வாசித்த நமது அண்ணன் சா.தமிழ்ச்செல்வன் இப்போது என்ன பா பாடுவார் என்பது தெரியவில்லை.
ஒரு சதுர இன்ச் கொண்ட பொருளை சக்தியாக்கி 2500 கி.மீட்டர் தொலைவுக்கு அனுப்பும் சாதனையை வரும் ஜூலை 15இல் இந்த அம்பி நடத்தப் போகிறாராம். இப்படி சக்தி உள்ள இந்த அம்பி அந்த பலான வீடியோவை அதுவும் படுக்கை அறைக்குள் கைக்கெட்டும் தூரத்தில் இருந்த காமராவை கண்டுபிடிக்க முடியவில்லையே? ஆய் போய்விட்டு கழுவத் தெரியாதவன் சூரியனுக்கு பேன் பார்த்த கதைதான். ஆனாலும் இந்த பொறுக்கி சாமியாருக்கு பணக்கார முட்டாள் பக்தர்கள் இருக்கும் வரையிலும் எந்தக் குறையுமில்லை.
கோயம்பேட்டில் மூட்டை தூக்கினால்தான் மூன்று வேளை சோறு என்று இந்த ஜன்மத்தை விட்டிருந்தால் கொஞ்சமாவது திருந்தியிருக்கும். அதை விடுத்து இன்னமும் தங்கத் தாம்பாளத்தில் வைத்து தாலாட்டு பாடும்போது நித்தியின் திமிர் புடைத்துக் கொண்டுதான் இருக்கும்.
The case against the controversial godman Swami Nithyananda still waits to be committed to trial after the CID filed the chargesheet in November 2010.
The delay is due to case files being shuffled between the Ramanagaram court and the High Court.
A recent application by the special public prosecutor seeking a direction for the medical examination of Nithyananda under section 53 (A) of the CrPC, has been challenged by Nithyananda. The Ramanagaram court is unable to dispose of the application as the case files are in the High Court.
The prosecutor said that the report received from the forensic expert on the video-recording was positive and that the image found in the video was conclusive of the presence of Nithyananda.
“Medical examination of the accused in a case of rape is mandatory. When he was arrested, this examination could not be conducted as there was no victim then. Subsequently, a victim from the US approached the CID and gave a statement. Now, the accused has to go through the medical examination,’’ special public prosecutor K. Janardhan said.
Nithyananda challenged the application for his medical examination and moved another application stating it would be breach of privacy. The Ramanagaram court could not dispose of this application as the files relating to the case are in the High Court.
Moreover, the prosecutor said that the case was yet to be committed to trial as there have been several applications filed before the Ramanagaram CJM court on the chargesheet filed by the CID.
“Accused number 5 in the case (Maa Sachidananda alias Ragini) was denied court permission to travel to the US. But, accused number 2 (Nithya Bhaktananda alias Gopala Seelam Reddy) went to the US and had to return on May 12. He did not return and, through his advocates, moved another application seeking extension. The CID submitted an objection to this in a sealed envelop and stated that the accused were travelling to the US to tamper with the evidence and the only victim who lives there" Mr Janardhan said.
The Ramanagaram court refused to grant the extension sought. The CID stated that the accused who went to the US have lodged several complaints against the victim in an attempt to threaten her.
The CID has examined 101 witnesses spread across the country and even abroad and submitted a 430-page chargesheet against Nithyananda and others.
The CID stated in the chargesheet that during the investigation a woman from the US appeared before the CID and deposed that she was repeatedly raped by Swami Nithyananda not only at his ashram in Bidadi, but in other parts of the country.
The swami allegedly told the victim that if she subjected herself to his sexual demands she would achieve enlightenment and that sex with Swamiji was the path to moksha.
The CID also placed before the court agreements signed between the devotees and ashram authorities taking the consent of the devotees for partaking in tantrik sex.
Those who are truly capable of independent thinking, watch the following video, read the information available and decide for yourself whether somebody is an Avatar or just a Cult Leader
Cult denotes a group that forms around a person who claims he or she has a special mission or knowledge, which will be shared with those who turn over most of their decision making to that self-appointed leader.
The term cult tends to imply something weird, something other than normal, something that is not us. But cults are far from marginal, and those who join them are no different from you or me. The issues they represent are basic to our society, to our understanding of each other, and to our accepting our vulnerabilities and the potential for abuse within our world.
Cults come in all sizes, form around any theme, and recruit persons of all ages and backgrounds. Not all cults are religious, as some people think. Their reasons for existing may concern religion, life-style, politics, or assorted philosophies. Not everyone who is approached by a cult recruiter joins, and of those who join, not all stay forever. Cults vary in how much financial and political power they wield. Some are local phenomena with only a dozen members. Others have thousands of members, operate multinational businesses, and control complex multimillion- if not multibillion-dollar organizations.
Modern-day cults and thought-reform groups tend to offer apparent utopias, places where all humankind's ills will be cured. The cults' lure is, if you just come along, all will be fine, and everyone will live happily ever after.
Since the 1960s, there has been a burgeoning of independent entrepreneurial groups that go into the mind-manipulation and personality-change business. Myriads of false messiahs, quacks, and leaders of cults and thought-reform groups have emerged who use Orwellian* mind-manipulation techniques. They recruit the curious, the unaffiliated, the trusting, and the altruistic. They promise intellectual, spiritual, political, social, and self-actualization utopias. These modern-day pied pipers offer, among other things, pathways to God, salvation, revolution, personal development, enlightenment, perfect health, psychological growth, egalitarianism, channels to speak with 35,000-year- old "entities," life in ecospheres, and contact with extraterrestrial beings.
There is truly a smorgasbord of spiritual, psychological, political, and other types of cults and cultic groups seeking adherents and devotees. Contrary to the myth that those who join cults are seekers, it is the cults that go out and actively and aggressively find followers. Eventually, those groups subject their followers to mind-numbing treatments that block critical and evaluative thinking and subjugate independent choice in a context of a strictly enforced hierarchy
The wisdom of the ages is that most manipulation is subtle and covert. When Orwell* drew on this wisdom, he envisioned the evolution of an insidious but successful mind and opinion manipulator. He would appear as a smiling, seemingly beneficent Big Brother. But instead of one Big Brother, we see hordes of Big Brothers in the world today. Many of them are cult leaders."
* In 1949, George Orwell wrote about the negative utopia he feared would evolve, perhaps by 1984.
Orwell's genius was in sensing that combinations of social and psychological techniques are easier, more effective, and cheaper than the gun-to-the-head methods of coercion. Social and psychological persuasion is also less likely to attract attention and thus is less apt to mobilize opposition early and easily from those being manipulated. Orwell reasoned that if a government could control all media and interpersonal communication while simultaneously forcing citizens to speak in a politically controlled jargon, it could blunt independent thinking. If thought could be controlled, then rebellious actions against a regime could be prevented. Not only in his book Nineteen Eighty-Four but also in his essays on politics and the English language, Orwell emphasized the power of words. Words represent thoughts, and without the capability to express thoughts, people lose access to their own thinking.
Margaret Thaler Singer, Ph.D., is one of the leading experts in the field of coercive persuasion, a clinical psychologist and emeritus adjunct professor at the University of California, Berkeley. In her career, she has counseled and interviewed more than 3,000 current and former cult members and their relatives and friends.