Breaking News

BREAKING NEWS


Nithyananda rape case trial next date: 6 Sept. 2018


Updates from Courts

UPDATES FROM COURTS


Supreme Court DISMISSED ALL PETITIONS by Nithyananda and his Secretaries to Discharge them without a trial (June 2018)



NITHYANANDA FOUNDATION GUILTY OF FRAUD - US COURT ORDERED RETURN OF DONATIONS 2012

17 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against whistleblower Dharmananda (lenin) by Nithyananda Cult Members!!!!

14 Retaliatory/false Complaints filed so far against victim Aarthi Rao by Nithyananda & his Cult Members!!!! (All of them after charge sheet against Nithyananda)

3 cases filed in the US against Accused 1 Nithyananda (Mr. Rajasekar), Nithyananda Foundation, Life Bliss Foundation,

4 cases filed in India against Nithyananda Dhyanapeetam for fraud:

Donors of Hyderabad Ashram, Rajapalayam Ashram,Trichy ashram and Seeragapadi Ashram (near Salem) demand that fraudulently obtained donations be returned

NITHYANANDA SLEAZE CD GENUINE : CID & FSL REPORT

Renowned Forensic Expert Padma Bhushan Prof. Dr. P. Chandra Sekharan states "video not morphed"


Nithyananda dismissed from Madurai Adheenam (on 19th Oct 2012), Nithyananda is banned from entering Madurai Adheenam mutt


Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Nithyananda Scandal and New Age Gurus on VijayTV Program

Watch Vijay TV (Tamil) Program 'Neeya Naana' episode on 30/5/2010. The topic for discussion is: "New Age Gurus, do we need them?" Watch all parts of this program, especially the guest appearance by Lenin (Dharmananda) to share his views on this topic and discussion of the Nithyananda Scandal.

Part 1:



Part 2:



Part 3:



Part 4:



Part 5:



Part 6:



Part 7:



Part 8:



Part 9:



Part 10:

13 comments:

  1. please please please please post english subtitles for the videos. i know the girl who is talking in the video and i want to know what lenin says to her. i want to hear the answers. please upload english subtitles!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks Lenin,
    I know and I"ve heard some mention in the ashram, that they are fine, but , these people have just stayed in the ashran for less than a year.Having stayed for just a short period and not knowing what happened before them, this girl is talking and even than , she doesnt know what is her master doing in his private time, as she has no access.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To Anonymous who says, "please please please please post english subtitles for the videos":...

    Basically, the girl says that she has been in the Ashram with 100 other Ashramites (Ladies) and that she knows for a fact that no encounters of sexual abuse was experienced by them; though she agrees that she had signed a similar non-disclosure agreement but, Rajasekaran had never approached them for sexual favours.
    She also challenges Lenin to bring forth the 35-40 sexual victims. In response Lenin says that he has been in the Ashram for more then 4 years and that she has just been there for 1 over year hence, do not know all that goes on in the Ashram. He also reiterates that victims of Rajasekaran, are in fear of their social well-being to come forward in public, to confess.
    That's the jist of their conversation.
    These fools who are still in the Ashram and some outside are blinded by their blind faith/love for their so-called Guru; a big fake. They do not understand that whatever spiritual experiences they have had while in the presence of the so-called Guru, is all their own awakening of their inner divine potentials. Due to their LOVE, DEVOTION & SURRENDER. Let them follow till doomsday, when awakening to the TRUTH shall be their REALIZATION; which is in the very near future.
    DHARMA SHALL PREVAIL...JAI HIND!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. That lady in yellow dress claims to be a brahmacharini and the guy (old one in red tshirt with a mala) claims that whatever Lenin says is false to which Lenin replies that visuals are very clear and full of evidence.
    Let the fools atleast realise their folly of blind worship of Rajasekhar.

    ReplyDelete
  5. thank you for the translation. this is very sad since i know the girl and i can't believe she's so duped by this still. i can't believe all these ashramites have not awakened to the truth. i thought they were smarter but i guess they are still blinded, not realizing they are responsible for their own experiences. and i can't believe she actually signed a non-disclosure agreement and is still talking like this! the fact that that non-disclosure agreement exists is, in itself, a bad thing and incriminating evidence that untoward things were happeneing in the ashram. i hope they wake up soon.

    ReplyDelete
  6. this girl is not a bhramachari. she was married. she came to the bidadi ashram and took initiation from rajshekharan in dec 2009...so that is not even a year...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I know her and she is definitely a brahmachari. She was newly married when she met Nithyananda. I don't know what happened to her husband, as I only met her after she became a brahmachari. She was living on the ashram when I was there. In mid-Feb 2010, N announced he was shaking everything up and transferred her and two other brahmachariis to run his org in the U.S. All three women were very upset, as they didn't want to leave the ashram. N said he was bringing Bhakta, Sadhananda, and Medha back to India. A few weeks later, the scandal broke!

    ReplyDelete
  8. i am sorry but please get your facts right and know the meaning of bhramacharyam...it is celibacy and if she is married then it is not bhramacharyam. she therefore is not a bhramacharini but may be a vanaprasthi(which according to the vedic tradition is taken by a married person only after completion of all familial and social duties and transcending all the desires. which we all know is not the case of many people in the bidadi ashram who have divorced their spouses and come off)

    ReplyDelete
  9. she was married and she took the first lbe. she's not divorced...but she lives in the ashram away from her husband. and since she is married, she is technically not, and can never be a brahmacharini. she would be a vanaprasta sannyasini. i guess the ashram is using brahmacharini to describe all the ladies though. maybe it's easier. but she's technically not. this is so stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi guys,
    I know this girl personally she is not a brhmachari. She married a white guy and then dumped him and was going after Nithy. She is no celebit. Her personality is such that really she is not practicing vanaprasthi. You indian guys are really crazy even to think that she has no sexual desires.

    Let me descibe a situation which happened in the US. At one of the Pada puja $1500.00 per familly fraud going on she was there hugging Nithy in such a way that even a dead male corpse will wake up you know where. I over heard Nithy telling her in Tamil 'Why are you fighting with me like a wife'. I heard that and thought it was not correct. Any way now everything is coming to make sense. I am sure she had sex with Nithy. After she cam back from Bididi afetr signing the contract she was acting different as if she owned the place. I am sue she tasted Nithy's experince and mistook that for enlightement.

    There are several other girls and women in USA who have tasted Nithy's Tantra and still stuck with that.

    Let me put it this way if you are under the impression that you are having sex with god would you ever denie that experince? the answer is no. Most of the women who had sex with Nithy will never leave him, beacuse if they ever do so, they can not live with that deception. I am a man and I had a hard time to dump Nithy even though I had no sex with him. It was difficult for me to accept that I was a fool and an idiot to have spend all the time and money on this scoundrel.

    ReplyDelete
  11. "Well said Anonymous, dated June 11, 2010 5:56A"

    The way this woman talks with such arrogance and has no compassion for other ladies who were abused; speaks for itself what kind of person she is. In the first place she marries one guy and dumps him for a fake (not realizing of course) guru and then disguises under the status of a renunciate, all these speaks very highly of her personal character. But then, one can't blame her either because to break up a couple and get the females in his crotch...I mean clutch, is Rajasekaran's tactics. He has done this to many a couple whose spouses are attractive...understand "spouses"....can be male or female.
    Rajasekaran is very sick person, his behaviour in the video with the actress and just go thru' his interview responses, after the exposure...a sly dog is what he is.
    I dumped him when I observed his key goons (male & female) behaved irrationally and with no compassion for fellow beings; focus was all money.
    I'm sure everyone who knows Rajasekaran, has observed the visible scar on his eyebrow. I've heard his goons weaved a spiritual story for the scar but, I also heard that he got that from a bashing he received when he began this cult and tried to mess around with another man's wife. One can only imagine what kind of mesmerization tactics/tantras he used to get this far.
    Despite all this, the fools in the ashrams are praying and fasting for his expedious return. He may come out of the clutch of the law due to lack of evidence. But he's doomed irrespective due to his own karmic follies.
    DHARMA SHALL PREVAIL! JAI HIND!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. i only wish , he does not escape with the existing loop holes in our indian law. he has to be punished severely ...
    he should not be hanged but he should be made to repent for lifetime. only then we will not have any more fraud godmen in future.
    HINDUISM IS GREAT .. SO PLEASE DON'T TAMPER IT !!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Well guys,
    Thanks for lot of unexposed stuff being brought out. Will any one start a debate on how Rajasekharan, Noble and other goons round him should be punished?

    ReplyDelete